Boris Johnson’s call for ubiquitous choosing deserted by MPs

5 min read
Media captionThe suit for an early choosing on 15 Oct is rejected.

Boris Johnson has faced a double better in a Commons after MPs incited down his suit for a ubiquitous election.

Earlier, MPs corroborated a check directed during restraint a no-deal Brexit if a PM hadn’t concluded a devise with a EU brazen of a 31 Oct deadline.

Mr Johnson pronounced a check “scuppered” negotiations and a usually approach brazen now was an election.

But Labour personality Jeremy Corbyn indicted a PM of “playing a treasonable game” to force a no-deal Brexit.

He pronounced his celebration would behind an choosing after a check had been passed, yet not before.

Both a SNP and a Liberal Democrats also criticised a primary minister’s suit as a tract to make certain a UK left a EU yet a deal.

But supporters of Mr Johnson strike behind during antithesis members who had been job for a ubiquitous choosing for dual years.

Mr Johnson wanted MPs to determine to an early ubiquitous choosing on 15 October, observant a check – that army him to ask for an prolongation to a Brexit deadline if no understanding had been concluded – left him incompetent to negotiate a deal.

He indispensable dual thirds of all MPs to opinion in foster underneath a Fixed Term Parliaments Act, yet a outcome usually saw 298 opinion for a suit and 56 opposite – 136 brief of a series he needed.

Labour sources told a BBC a celebration abstained on a vote, nonetheless 3 MPs seemed to have voted for it and 28 against.

The SNP also abstained.

The check to retard no understanding upheld all a stages in a Commons in one day, with a support of many antithesis parties and 21 Tory rebels, as they attempted to pull it by brazen of Parliament being dangling subsequent week.

It will now go to a Lords for approval.

Peers are debating a business suit on how to pierce brazen with a check – yet pro-Brexit peers have laid down over 100 amendments to derail a progress.

Media captionBoris Johnson calls for Oct election

Speaking after a vote, a PM pounded Mr Corbyn, claiming he was “the initial personality of a antithesis in a approved story of a nation to exclude a invitation to an election”.

He pronounced he “urged [Mr Corbyn’s] colleagues to simulate on a unsustainability of this position overnight and in a march of a subsequent few days.”

‘Accept your duty’

Earlier, a Labour personality pronounced Mr Johnson’s offer of an choosing was “a bit like an offer of an apple to Snow White from a Wicked Queen… charity a poison of a no deal”.

He added: “Let this check [to retard a no deal] pass and benefit Royal Assent, afterwards we will behind an choosing so we do not pile-up out.”

One comparison MP told a BBC’s domestic editor Laura Kuenssberg that Mr Corbyn had pronounced he would not concede Mr Johnson to have an choosing before 31 October.

The personality of a SNP in Westminster, Ian Blackford, pronounced a discuss about an early choosing was usually going brazen since a PM had mislaid a opinion opposite a bill.

He added: “[Mr Johnson] contingency accept a will of this House, accept a check that Parliament has passed, accept your avocation as primary apportion and go to a European Council on 17 Oct and negotiate a prolongation we have been educated to deliver.”

Please ascent your browser to perspective this interactive

Did your MP opinion in foster of permitting a supervision to postpone Parliament in sequence to secure Brexit on 30 October?

Enter a postcode, or a name or subdivision of your MP

Leader of a Liberal Democrats, Jo Swinson, praised a cross-party work on a check as “putting a inhabitant seductiveness first”, yet cursed Mr Johnson’s reaction.

“I am intrigued that as a outcome of this vote… a primary minister’s response is this somehow messes adult his plan,” she added.

“If he is severely observant a border of his devise was to try to brag a EU and usually get a good understanding by melancholy [to] leave yet a deal… it is not really good suspicion through.”

But Tory MP Nigel Evans criticised a opposition, revelation a Commons: “They have been given an event [for an election] and they are using frightened – not only from a primary minister, not only from a ubiquitous election, yet from a people of this nation who in 2016 pronounced they wanted to leave a EU.”

Earlier, shade Brexit secretary Sir Keir Starmer told Labour MPs a care would not behind an choosing until a Brexit check had been concluded with a EU – creation a 15 Oct offer impossible.

But a First Minister of Scotland and personality of a SNP, Nicola Sturgeon, tweeted that a antithesis parties contingency “seek to force [an] election” after a check becomes law yet before Parliament is suspended.

She added: “It’s starting to feel like Labour doesn’t wish an choosing during all and withdrawal this PM in place meaningful he’ll try each pretence in book to get what he wants would be irresponsible.”

What does a no-deal check say?

The check says a primary apportion will have until 19 Oct to possibly pass a understanding in Parliament or get MPs to approve a no-deal Brexit.

Once this deadline has passed, he will have to ask an prolongation to a UK’s depart date to 31 Jan 2020 – and, unusually, a check indeed includes a diction of a minute he would have to write.

If a EU responds by proposing a opposite date, a PM will have dual days to accept that proposal. During that time, MPs – not a supervision – will have a event to reject a EU’s date.

The check also requires ministers to news to a House of Commons over a subsequent few months. potentially providing some-more opportunities to take control of a timetable.

Be wakeful though, this could all change over a subsequent few days since MPs and peers have a energy to pass amendments to any law.

Meanwhile, a fallout from No 10’s preference to repel a celebration whip from 21 Tory rebels who corroborated a check to retard no understanding has continued to face critique from others in a party.

A organisation of around 80 Conservatives have created to a primary minister, job on him to re-instate a whip to a “principled, industrious and dedicated” MPs.

In a matter on interest of a “One Nation Caucus”, former apportion and Tory MP Damian Green said: “Removing a whip from valued colleagues who have served their nation and celebration with eminence indemnification a wish of winning a subsequent ubiquitous election.”

Leave your vote

0 points
Upvote Downvote



Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.